- Michael Saylor’s shift to support institutional Bitcoin custody sparks strong criticism from the community.
- Simon Dixon and Vitalik Buterin criticize Saylor, suggesting his stance benefits big financial institutions.
- Saylor’s call for institutional Bitcoin custody contradicts his past advocacy for self-custody and decentralization.
Michael Saylor has come under fire for saying that Bitcoin custody should be managed by huge financial institutions rather than individual self-custody. His statements, expressed during an interview with Madison Reidy on October 21, sparked strong reactions from the Bitcoin community.
Saylor has long been a supporter of Bitcoin self-custody. He cited its relevance in maintaining decentralization and protecting users from centralized power. His recent views, which advocate for institutional custodianship, represent an unexpected reversal in his stance.
Saylor supported the change, claiming that concerns about government confiscation of Bitcoin are overstated and motivated by paranoid crypto-anarchists.
Saylor Community Criticism
The Bitcoin community reacted rapidly to Saylor’s remarks, with many prominent figures expressing disbelief. Simon Dixon said that Saylor’s shift in opinion could be motivated by MicroStrategy’s likely ambitions to become a Bitcoin-focused financial institution.
This change, Dixon says, might benefit from institutional custodianship if MicroStrategy begins to offer services such as collateralized loans.
John Carvalho, CEO of Synonym, accused Saylor of deviating Bitcoin from its initial function as a decentralized currency by transforming it into a mere investment vehicle. In addition, Carvalho saw Saylor’s words as a deviation from the ideas that first attracted people to Bitcoin.
Vitalik Buterin Weighs In
Vitalik Buterin openly opposed Saylor’s remarks, adding to the disapproval. Buterin replied to a message from Jameson Lopp, the chief security officer of Casa, who praised the benefits of self-custody. Moreover, Buterin called Saylor’s comments crazy, adding to the uproar against the MicroStrategy CEO.
Buterin went on to argue that Saylor’s support for institutional custodianship is consistent with a policy that encourages regulatory capture. He suggested that heavily regulated organizations such as BlackRock and Fidelity might hold Bitcoin under government control. This will undermine the cryptocurrency’s decentralized spirit.
disclaimer read moreCrypto News Land, also abbreviated as "CNL", is an independent media entity - we are not affiliated with any company in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry. We aim to provide fresh and relevant content that will help build up the crypto space since we believe in its potential to impact the world for the better. All of our news sources are credible and accurate as we know it, although we do not make any warranty as to the validity of their statements as well as their motive behind it. While we make sure to double-check the veracity of information from our sources, we do not make any assurances as to the timeliness and completeness of any information in our website as provided by our sources. Moreover, we disclaim any information on our website as investment or financial advice. We encourage all visitors to do your own research and consult with an expert in the relevant subject before making any investment or trading decision.
