Hinman Emails Reveal XRP Doesn’t Satisfy Howey’s Security Test

XRP-Halts-Recovery-Ahead-of-Ripple-June-7-Hearing
  1. Exhibit 220 of the Hinman emails says there is evidence to conclude XRP is not a security.
  2. SEC was denied in its request to seal the Hinman emails but was denied.
  3. SEC has to provide the unredacted version of the emails on or before June 13.

A couple of days ago, the controversial emails from former SEC director William Hinman have been ruled to be appropriate to be revealed in court to be used as evidence. This was enough to cause XRP supporters and investors to rejoice.

Yet a couple of minutes ago, crypto lawyer John Deaton found out Exhibit 220, which could potentially become the game-winner for Ripple. According to the evidence, there are reasonable grounds to conclude that XRP doesn’t qualify as a security.

Specifically, the footnote wrote: 

“There are reasonable grounds to conclude that XRP does not satisfy all elements of the Howey analysis and is therefore not a security for purposes of the federal securities laws.”

Others seem to have picked up the information as well, saying that the SEC has shot itself in the foot.

Read CRYPTONEWSLAND on Google News google news

Judge Analisa Torres, the officer in charge of handing the verdict of the two-year lawsuit, has initially ordered the SEC to disclose on June 6 the unredacted Hinman emails, which Ripple Labs believes to be crucial to its case. However, both parties have requested an extension until June 13.

Meanwhile, XRP’s price has surged by 10% in the last 7 days while leading coins such as BTC and ETH are practically static. At the time of writing, XRP is changing hands at $0.47, according to CoinGecko.

Read Also :

Crypto News Land, also abbreviated as "CNL", is an independent media entity - we are not affiliated with any company in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry. We aim to provide fresh and relevant content that will help build up the crypto space since we believe in its potential to impact the world for the better. All of our news sources are credible and accurate as we know it, although we do not make any warranty as to the validity of their statements as well as their motive behind it. While we make sure to double-check the veracity of information from our sources, we do not make any assurances as to the timeliness and completeness of any information in our website as provided by our sources. Moreover, we disclaim any information on our website as investment or financial advice. We encourage all visitors to do your own research and consult with an expert in the relevant subject before making any investment or trading decision.

Other posts